The bioprinting industry divides into three rough groups: companies that build the machines, companies that supply the materials, and companies developing actual tissue products. Many do two of the three. Below are twenty-four organisations working in the field, with what each is known for.

This directory is independent and unpaid. Links go to each company's own site and are marked nofollow. Ownership in this sector changes frequently through acquisition — if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.

Printer and platform makers

  • CELLINK

    Sweden · part of BICO Group

    Launched what it billed as the first commercially available universal bioink in 2016 and built the widely used BIO X printer line. Its arrival did more than most single developments to make bioprinting reproducible between laboratories.

    cellink.com →
  • REGENHU

    Switzerland

    One of the longer-established bioprinter manufacturers, known for the 3DDiscovery and R-GEN benchtop systems that support several deposition methods in a single machine.

    regenhu.com →
  • EnvisionTEC / ETEC

    Germany and USA · part of Desktop Metal

    Its 3D-Bioplotter is among the longest-running bioprinting platforms in continuous use, dating back to work begun in the late 1990s. Acquired by Desktop Metal in 2021 and rebranded ETEC.

    etec.desktopmetal.com →
  • Advanced Solutions Life Sciences

    Louisville, Kentucky, USA

    Builds the BioAssemblyBot, a six-axis robotic-arm bioprinter, paired with its TSIM design software — an unusual approach that treats bioprinting as a robotics problem rather than a gantry problem.

    advancedsolutions.com →
  • Allevi

    USA · acquired by 3D Systems in 2021

    Made affordable desktop bioprinters that put the technology within reach of ordinary university laboratories, and did a great deal to widen the field's user base.

    allevi3d.com →
  • Brinter

    Turku, Finland

    Modular multi-material platform aimed at both tissue engineering and pharmaceutical applications, with interchangeable print heads for different deposition methods.

    brinter.com →
  • REGEMAT 3D

    Granada, Spain

    Customisable bioprinters plus its own tissue-engineering programmes, with a particular focus on cartilage regeneration.

    regemat3d.com →
  • Cyfuse Biomedical

    Tokyo, Japan

    Its Regenova system uses the distinctive scaffold-free "Kenzan" method: cell spheroids are skewered onto a fine needle array in a programmed arrangement and allowed to fuse, with no bioink at all.

    cyfusebio.com →
  • Poietis

    Bordeaux, France

    Built its platform around laser-assisted bioprinting, which allows near single-cell placement without a nozzle. Its most advanced work is in printed skin.

    poietis.com →
  • 3D Bioprinting Solutions

    Moscow, Russia

    Best known for magnetic bioprinting in microgravity: its Organ.Aut device was operated aboard the International Space Station, where the absence of gravity allows constructs to be assembled without a supporting scaffold.

    bioprinting.ru →
  • n3D Biosciences

    Texas, USA · acquired by Greiner Bio-One

    Developed magnetic 3D bioprinting and levitation, in which cells are tagged with magnetic nanoparticles and assembled by magnetic fields rather than deposited by a nozzle.

    n3dbio.com →
  • Digilab

    Massachusetts, USA

    Long-standing life-science instrument maker whose CellJet cell printer sits alongside a broader range of biological sample-preparation equipment.

    digilabglobal.com →

Tissue and therapy developers

  • Organovo

    San Diego, USA

    The industry's pioneer. Launched exVive3D bioprinted human liver tissue in 2014, the first commercially sold bioprinted tissue, and demonstrated that printed constructs could be manufactured reproducibly enough for pharmaceutical customers.

    organovo.com →
  • Aspect Biosystems

    Vancouver, Canada

    Its microfluidic Lab-on-a-Printer platform forms bioink fibres inside the print head itself, allowing composition to change on the fly mid-print. Focused on bioprinted tissue therapeutics, and has entered large partnerships with pharmaceutical companies on metabolic disease.

    aspectbiosystems.com →
  • Cellbricks

    Berlin, Germany

    Uses light-based, stereolithographic printing to build implantable tissue, with work directed at replacing organ function rather than at research models.

    cellbricks.com →
  • Pandorum Technologies

    Bangalore, India

    Developing bioengineered corneal tissue and liquid cornea products for corneal damage, alongside liver tissue programmes.

    pandorum.com →
  • Precise Bio

    USA and Israel

    Works on ocular tissue, with corneal grafts as the lead programme, using a four-dimensional bioprinting approach in which printed constructs change shape or property over time.

    precise-bio.com →
  • ROKIT Healthcare

    Seoul, South Korea

    Its Dr. INVIVO platform is aimed at autologous regenerative medicine using a patient's own tissue, with diabetic foot ulcers and cartilage among the clinical targets.

    rokithealthcare.com →
  • Tevido BioDevices

    Austin, Texas, USA

    Focused on printed skin constructs containing melanocytes, with vitiligo and grafts that pigment to match surrounding skin as the target application.

    tevidobiodevices.com →
  • Modern Meadow

    New Jersey, USA

    Applies biofabrication outside medicine, developing bio-based materials as alternatives to animal leather — a reminder that the underlying techniques are not confined to healthcare.

    modernmeadow.com →

Scaffolds, implants and medical 3D printing

  • Materialise

    Leuven, Belgium

    A major force in medical 3D printing rather than bioprinting proper: software for converting medical scans into printable models, patient-specific surgical guides and anatomical models used for operative planning.

    materialise.com →
  • Tissue Regeneration Systems

    Michigan, USA

    Resorbable, patient-specific bone implants printed from a patient's own CT scan. The scaffold supports the defect while native bone grows in, then gradually degrades.

    tissuesys.com →
  • Nanofiber Solutions

    Ohio, USA

    Electrospun nanofibre scaffolds that mimic the architecture of native extracellular matrix, used for tissue repair and as substrates for cell culture.

    nanofibersolutions.com →
  • Medprin

    Guangzhou, China

    Best known for ReDura, an electrospun regenerative dura mater substitute used in neurosurgery — one of the more widely deployed regenerative products from this group of companies.

    medprin.com →

How to read this industry

Three patterns are worth noticing when assessing any company here.

Revenue today comes from tools and models, not therapies. Printer makers and bioink suppliers sell to laboratories. Tissue companies mostly sell testing services to pharmaceutical firms. Almost nobody is selling an implantable printed tissue at scale, which means the sector is largely funded by research budgets rather than by healthcare payers.

Consolidation is constant. Allevi, EnvisionTEC and n3D Biosciences have all been acquired. Expect ownership to keep changing.

Clinical programmes are narrow by design. The companies closest to patients are working on cartilage, skin, cornea and islets — thin or avascular tissue. That is not a lack of ambition; it is where the biology currently allows progress.


Related

Last reviewed . Educational information only — not medical advice.